A Comparative Study of Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Methods: Application in Gumma, Korea

  • Ki M
  • Yoon H
  • Koh D
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the present study, several groundwater vulnerability assessment methods were applied to an agricultural area of Gumma in Korea. For the groundwater intrinsic vulnerability assessment, the performance of DRASTIC, SINTACS and GOD models was compared and an ensemble approach was suggested. M-DRASTIC and multi-linear regression (MLR) models were applied for the groundwater specific vulnerability assessment to nitrate of the study site. The correlation coefficient between the nitrate concentration and M-DRASTIC index was as low as 0.24. The result of the MLR model showed that the correlation coefficient is 0.62 and the areal extents of livestock farming and upland field are most influential factors for the nitrate contamination of groundwater in the study site.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ki, M.-G., Yoon, H., Koh, D.-C., Hamm, S.-Y., Lee, C.-M., & Kim, H.-S. (2013). A Comparative Study of Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Methods: Application in Gumma, Korea. Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment, 18(3), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.7857/jsge.2013.18.3.119

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free