Short communication: Experimental factors affecting fission-track counts in apatite

7Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The tools for interpreting fission-track data are evolving apace, but, even so, the outcomes cannot be better than the data. Recent studies showed that track etching and observation affect confined-track length measurements. We investigated the effects of grain orientation, polishing, etching and observation on fission-track counts in apatite. Our findings throw light on the phenomena that affect the track counts and hence the sample ages, whilst raising the question: what counts as an etched surface track? This is pertinent to manual and automatic track counts and to designing training strategies for neural networks. Counting prism faces and using the ζ calibration for age calculation are assumed to deal with most etching- and counting-related factors. However, prism faces are not unproblematic for counting, and other surface orientations are not unusable. Our results suggest that a reinvestigation of the etching properties of different apatite faces could increase the range useful for dating and lift a significant restriction for provenance studies. Copyright:

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aslanian, C., Jonckheere, R., Wauschkuhn, B., & Ratschbacher, L. (2022). Short communication: Experimental factors affecting fission-track counts in apatite. Geochronology, 4(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-109-2022

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free