Choice of vasopressor in septic shock: Does it matter?

4Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Septic shock is a medical emergency that is associated with mortality rates of 40-70%. Prompt recognition and institution of effective therapy is required for optimal outcome. When the shock state persists after adequate fluid resuscitation, vasopressor therapy is required to improve and maintain adequate tissue/organ perfusion in an attempt to improve survival and prevent the development of multiple organ dysfunction and failure. Controversy surrounding the optimum choice of vasopressor strategy to utilize in the management of patients with septic shock continues. A recent randomized study of epinephrine compared to norepinephrine (plus dobutamine when indicated) leads to more questions than answers. © 2007 BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Patel, G. P., & Balk, R. A. (2007). Choice of vasopressor in septic shock: Does it matter? Critical Care, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc6159

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free