Self-calibrating pulse contour cardiac output: do validation studies really show its clinical reliability?

5Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The present study was performed to test a new software version of the FloTrac/Vigileo using head-up-head-down tilting in post-cardiac surgery patients. Impressive improvements in Bland and Altman limits of agreement from 37.5% to 21.6% were recorded. The results, however could be attributed to a failure to produce a wide enough range of test circulatory conditions. A more rigorous test of performance is needed before any real conclusion concerning use of the FloTrac/Vigileo in clinical practice can be made.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Critchley, L. A. H. (2009). Self-calibrating pulse contour cardiac output: do validation studies really show its clinical reliability? Critical Care (London, England). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc7718

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free