Marxism as a theoretical and methodological framework in collective health: Implications for systematic review and synthesis of evidence

15Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this study, we discuss the integration in systematic reviews of research developed from a Marxist perspective of knowledge production and their results as evidence in healthcare. The study objectives are to review the assumptions of dialectical and historical materialism (DHM) and discuss the implications of dialectics for a literature review and the synthesis of evidence. DHM is a powerful framework for knowledge generation and transformation of policies and practices in healthcare. It assumes that social contradictions underlie the health-disease process, the fundamental theoretical construction in the field of collective health. Currently, we observe a considerable influence of the critical paradigm, of Marxist origin, in the construction of knowledge in health. Studies based on this critical paradigm incorporate complex methods, which are inherent to the guidelines of dialect, to identify the object and arrive at results that constitute evidence in healthcare. Systematic reviews should address the methodological difficulties associated with entirely integrating these results to healthcare.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Soares, C. B., Campos, C. M. S., & Yonekura, T. (2013). Marxism as a theoretical and methodological framework in collective health: Implications for systematic review and synthesis of evidence. Revista Da Escola de Enfermagem, 47(6), 1400–1406. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420130000600022

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free