Conservative interventions for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review protocol

2Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background:Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is the downward descent of vaginal walls, affecting the health of 32% to 76% female patients. Conservative interventions are considered as priority before seeking help from surgery. We plan to make the systematic review to assess the effectiveness of conservative intervention for adult women with POP.Methods:Studies will be searched in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to July 2017. Primary outcomes are specific POP-related symptom, severity of prolapse, Prolapse-related, and general health-related quality of life and other non-POP-specific symptoms.Results:The data will be synthesized if possible using MD, SMD or RR. A descriptive analysis will be made if the data cannot be synthesized.Discussion:The systematic review might provide solid evidence for the treatment of POP by conservative intervention.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sun, Y., Chen, H., Liu, Y., Jiao, R., Yuan, J., Zhang, X., & Liu, Z. (2019). Conservative interventions for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review protocol. Medicine (United States), 98(47). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018116

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free