Abstract
Cognitive Continuum Theory (CCT) is an adaptive theory of human judgment. CCT posits a continuum of cognitive modes anchored by intuition and analysis. The theory specifies surface and depth task characteristics that are likely to induce cognitive modes at different points along the cognitive continuum. The current study manipulated both the surface (information representation) and depth (task structure) characteristics of a multiple-cue integration threat assessment task. The surface manipulation influenced cognitive mode in the predicted direction with an iconic information display inducing a more intuitive mode than a numeric information display. The depth manipulation influenced cognitive mode in a pattern not predicted by CCT. Results indicate this difference was due to a combination of task complexity and participant satisficing. As predicted, analysis produced a more leptokurtic error distribution than intuition. Task achievement was a function of the extent to which participants demonstrated an analytic cognitive mode index, and not a function of correspondence, as predicted. This difference was likely due to the quantitative nature of the task manipulations.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Cooksey, R. W. (2000). Commentary on ?cognitive adaptation and its consequences: a test of cognitive continuum theory? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<55::aid-bdm340>3.0.co;2-h
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.