Asymmetry in information acquisition—Exploring the principal–agent dyad of sport organizations and sport management higher education institutions

4Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study is based on a metaphorical contract in sport management, whereby sport organizations (the principal) engage sport management higher education institutions (the agent) in qualifying graduates according to industry demands. There is asymmetry in the contract due to the lack of incentives for the principal to provide specific information and the agent’s ignorance about this information. A third party can acquire crucial information that sport management higher education institutions need to fulfil the contract. Based on a qualitative content analysis of 12 interviews with sport organization representatives, the study finds that sport management higher education institutions need to focus on either developing generic competencies or credibly signalling the value of sport management-specific competencies in their curriculum in order to efficiently fulfil the contract.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wohlfart, O., Adam, S., & Hovemann, G. (2021). Asymmetry in information acquisition—Exploring the principal–agent dyad of sport organizations and sport management higher education institutions. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, 51(3), 344–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-021-00722-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free