The public international law theory of Hans Kelsen: Believing in universal law

132Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This analysis of Hans Kelsen's international law theory takes into account the context of the German international legal discourse in the first half of the twentieth century, including the reactions of Carl Schmitt and other Weimar opponents of Kelsen. The relationship between his Pure Theory of Law and his international law writings is examined, enabling the reader to understand how Kelsen tried to square his own liberal cosmopolitan project with his methodological convictions as laid out in his Pure Theory of Law. Finally, Jochen von Bernstorff discusses the limits and continuing relevance of Kelsenian formalism for international law under the term of ‘reflexive formalism’, and offers a reflection on Kelsen's theory of international law against the background of current debates over constitutionalisation, institutionalisation and fragmentation of international law. The book also includes biographical sketches of Hans Kelsen and his main students Alfred Verdross and Joseph L. Kunz.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

von Bernstorff, J., & Thomas, D. (2010). The public international law theory of Hans Kelsen: Believing in universal law. The Public International Law Theory of Hans Kelsen: Believing in Universal Law (pp. 1–328). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511776953

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free