Abstract
Drawing upon the implementation of the Intensive Alternative to Custody in Greater Manchester, this article explores the key concerns voiced by sentencers when presented with a Pre-Sentence Report (PSR) proposing an 'alternative to custody'. It is argued that the crucial element for effective implementation lies in the gatekeeping provided by PSR authors (probation staff), the dissemination of timely and relevant information to sentencers, and the reassurance that the order fulfils the requisite 'penal punch' to avoid accusations of 'soft options'. © The Author(s) 2013.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Taylor, E., Clarke, R., & McArt, D. (2014). The Intensive Alternative to Custody: “Selling” sentences and satisfying judicial concerns. Probation Journal, 61(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550513489760
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.