The Intensive Alternative to Custody: 'Selling' sentences and satisfying judicial concerns

7Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Drawing upon the implementation of the Intensive Alternative to Custody in Greater Manchester, this article explores the key concerns voiced by sentencers when presented with a Pre-Sentence Report (PSR) proposing an 'alternative to custody'. It is argued that the crucial element for effective implementation lies in the gatekeeping provided by PSR authors (probation staff), the dissemination of timely and relevant information to sentencers, and the reassurance that the order fulfils the requisite 'penal punch' to avoid accusations of 'soft options'. © The Author(s) 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Taylor, E., Clarke, R., & McArt, D. (2014). The Intensive Alternative to Custody: “Selling” sentences and satisfying judicial concerns. Probation Journal, 61(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550513489760

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free