Adjusted indirect and mixed comparisons of conservative treatments for hallux valgus: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

15Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Hallux valgus (HV) deformity is a common, potentially debilitating deform-ity. And evidence with high-quality for the conservative treatments of HV deformity is still re-quired.; AIMS: To compare the effects of different conservative treatments for hallux valgus deformity by using the method of network meta-analysis.; Study Design: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE, MED-LINE, OVID, and CINAHL. The included studies should have the characteristics that: (1) partici-pants with hallux valgus deformity of any age (2) conservative treatments (3) Reported the hallux valgus (HVA), the intermetatarsal angle (IMA), the score of the Visual Analog Scale, and the score of Foot Function Index.; Results: 11 studies were included in this review. The agreement between reviewers reached a kappa value of 0.75. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that a combination of exercise and toe separator, night splints, and dry needling are most likely to be the best choice for reducing the hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle, and toe separa-tors (with or without exercise), dry needling, and manipulation (with or without ice treatment) have advantages in improving the subjective feeling of patients.; Conclusions: Multi-disciplinary conservative treatments have a great potential for hallux valgus deformity. More research with high-quality is needed to give a comprehensive and reasonable scheme of a holistic and long-term treatment protocol.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ying, J., Xu, Y., István, B., & Ren, F. (2021, April 1). Adjusted indirect and mixed comparisons of conservative treatments for hallux valgus: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073841

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free