Abstract
Background: Data on cognitive impairment in patients with Long-COVID remain controversial. Methods: The study analyzed in patients followed for Long-COVID the frequency and risk factors for cognitive impairment (defined by a Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA] score < 24 points), its associations with subjectively reported cognitive and psychological symptoms, and the evolution of cognitive impairment and cognitive symptoms over time. Results: At a mean interval of 259 days from COVID-19, the mean MoCA score recorded among 118 individuals was 25.5, with 32.2% of them showing scores < 24 points. Eighty-five patients (72.0%) presented persisting symptoms, predominantly represented by fatigue (35.6%), dyspnea (28.8%) and cognitive symptoms (24.6%). A MoCA score < 24 was significantly associated with older age, hospitalization during acute disease and female sex. Individuals with persisting cognitive symptoms had significantly lower MoCA scores compared to individuals without such symptoms, with a mean difference of 1.4 points. Anxiety and depression were not associated with lower MoCA scores. In a subsequent evaluation conducted in 66 individuals (55.9%) at an average interval of 959 days from COVID-19, the mean MoCA score decreased by 1.3 points (95%CI 0.5-2, p = 0.001), the frequency of a MoCA score < 24 increased from 25.8% to 36.4% (p = 0.090), and the prevalence of cognitive symptoms increased from 27.3% to 53.0% (p = 0.002). Discussion: Cognitive impairment in Long-COVID appeared common and persisting. Cognitive symptoms, unlike psychological symptoms, were associated with lower cognitive scores and tended to accumulate during follow-up. Advanced age, severity of acute SARS-CoV-2 disease and female sex should be considered as potential risk factors.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Floridia, M., Weimer, L. E., Bonfanti, P., Forte, A. L., Cogliandro, V., Bottaro, V., … Onder, G. (2026). Cognitive impairment in long-COVID: frequency, trajectories and risk factors in a cohort study from Italy. Neurological Sciences, 47(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-026-09042-z
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.