Levels of SARS-CoV-2 population exposure are considerably higher than suggested by seroprevalence surveys

15Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Accurate knowledge of prior population exposure has critical ramifications for preparedness plans for future SARS-CoV-2 epidemic waves and vaccine prioritization strategies. Serological studies can be used to estimate levels of past exposure and thus position populations in their epidemic timeline. To circumvent biases introduced by the decay in antibody titers over time, methods for estimating population exposure should account for seroreversion, to reflect that changes in seroprevalence measures over time are the net effect of increases due to recent transmission and decreases due to antibody waning. Here, we present a new method that combines multiple datasets (serology, mortality, and virus positivity ratios) to estimate seroreversion time and infection fatality ratios (IFR) and simultaneously infer population exposure levels. The results indicate that the average time to seroreversion is around six months, IFR is 0.54% to 1.3%, and true exposure may be more than double the current seroprevalence levels reported for several regions of England.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, S., Flegg, J. A., White, L. J., & Aguas, R. (2021). Levels of SARS-CoV-2 population exposure are considerably higher than suggested by seroprevalence surveys. PLoS Computational Biology, 17(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009436

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free