Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Pure Native Aortic Valve Regurgitation: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a recent and an effective treatment option for high- or extreme-surgical-risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. However, pure severe native aortic valve regurgitation (NAVR) without aortic stenosis remains a contraindication to TAVR. The aim of our systemic review analysis was to evaluate TAVR in patients with pure NAVR. Methods: We searched the published articles in the PubMed and Web of Science databases (2002-2017) using the Boolean operators for studies of NAVR patients undergoing TAVR. Reference lists of all returned articles were searched recursively for other relevant citations. Pooled estimates were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis. Results: Finally, a total of 10 studies were included in this analysis. The CoreValve was more frequently used with a lower rate of device success and a higher rate of residual aortic regurgitation. The new-generation transcatheter heart valves (THVs) performed a significantly higher rate with less residual aortic regurgitation and a success rate close to 100%. The 30-day all-cause mortality rates ranged from 0 to 30% with an estimate summary rate of 9% (95% CI: 5-15%; I 2 = 33%). Cerebrovascular events, major or life-threatening bleeding, major vascular complications, acute kidney disease, and new permanent pacemaker implantation occurred similarly in both the new- and old-generation THV devices. Conclusions: Aortic regurgitation remains a challenging pathology for TAVR. TAVR is a feasible and reasonable option for carefully selected patients with pure aortic regurgitation.