Experts Opinion: OCTA vs. FFA/ICG in Uveitis–Which Will Survive?: “Ten questions to find one answer”

19Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Will optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) replace invasive imaging techniques like fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and indocyanine green (ICG) angiography entirely? While OCTA is being increasingly applied in the field of medical retina, will we see this change in the subspeciality of uveitis? In this article, five uveitis specialists with renowned imaging expertise answer to 10 specific questions to address this issue. The final verdict based on the comments of the experts suggests that FFA and ICG cannot be replaced by OCTA in uveitis, at least for now. While OCTA can offer new insights into the pathogenesis of certain inflammatory conditions and help in the diagnosis of complications like inflammatory choroidal neovascularisation, multimodal imaging is still the preferred approach in the assessment of patients with uveitis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Invernizzi, A., Carreño, E., Pichi, F., Munk, M. R., Agarwal, A., Zierhut, M., & Pavesio, C. (2023). Experts Opinion: OCTA vs. FFA/ICG in Uveitis–Which Will Survive?: “Ten questions to find one answer.” Ocular Immunology and Inflammation. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2022.2084421

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free