The Crime Of Damage After the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 76/PUU-XV/2017

23Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

From 2009 until now, there have been 30 cases tried by the Court with the use of Article 27 paragraph (3) of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. These various cases have raised opinions from some people who consider defamation offenses contrary to the spirit of reform that upholds freedom of thought and expression. Crime of reputation after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 50/PUU-VI/2008, Constitutional Court Decision Number 2/PUU-VII/2009, Constitutional Court Decision Number 5/PUU-VIII/2010, Constitutional Court Decision Number 31/PUU-XIII/ 2015, and the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 76/PUU-XV/2017 concerning the Review of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 regarding Information and Electronic Transactions against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia are regulated in detail with one of the points, namely making changes in Article 27 paragraph (3) of the ITE Law and reducing criminal threats in 2 (two) provisions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jaelani, A. K., & Luthviati, R. D. (2021). The Crime Of Damage After the Constitutional Court’s Decision Number 76/PUU-XV/2017. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 1(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v1i1.5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free