Abstract
The ‘baseball’ orbital implant was described by Frueh and Felker in 1976. Although this implant was originally described for use as a secondary implant, it has also been widely used as a primary implant at the time of enucleation. This prospective study evaluated the effectiveness of this implant used both primarily and secondarily. Forty-four patients were implanted between April 1990 and May 1991, 19 of the implants being primary and 25 secondary. A standardised operative and post-operative protocol was followed. The mean follow-up time was 31 months (range 24–36 months). The patients were evaluated for the degree of volume replacement, implant and associated prosthesis motility, secondary eyelid and socket problems, patient satisfaction, the need for further surgery and post-operative complications. The overall results achieved by primary implantation were superior to those of secondary implantation. Our results suggest that this implant provides a satisfactory functional and cosmetic rehabilitation of the anophthalmic patient with few complications. © 1994 Royal College of Ophthalmologists.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Leatherbarrow, B., Kwartz, J., Sunderland, S., Brammar, R., & Nichol, E. (1994). The ‘baseball’ orbital implant: A prospective study. Eye (Basingstoke), 8(5), 569–576. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1994.139
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.