Contextual stance classification of opinions: A step towards enthymeme reconstruction in online reviews

26Citations
Citations of this article
102Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Enthymemes, that are arguments with missing premises, are common in natural language text. They pose a challenge for the field of argument mining, which aims to extract arguments from such text. If we can detect whether a premise is missing in an argument, then we can either fill the missing premise from similar/related arguments, or discard such enthymemes altogether and focus on complete arguments. In this paper, we draw a connection between explicit vs. implicit opinion classification in reviews, and detecting arguments from enthymemes. For this purpose, we train a binary classifier to detect explicit vs. implicit opinions using a manually labelled dataset. Experimental results show that the proposed method can discriminate explicit opinions from implicit ones, thereby providing encouraging first step towards enthymeme detection in natural language texts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rajendran, P., Bollegala, D., & Parsons, S. (2016). Contextual stance classification of opinions: A step towards enthymeme reconstruction in online reviews. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 31–39). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w16-2804

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free