Impact of coordination, psychological safety, and job security on employees’ performance: the moderating role of coercive pressure

28Citations
Citations of this article
251Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Based on institutional theory, the current study examines the relationship of coordination, job security, psychological safety, and coercive pressure with employees’ performance. Further, coercive pressure is treated as a boundary condition between coordination, job security, and psychological safety with employees’ performance. A survey method was used to collect data from 235 faculty members of higher education institutions (HEIs) in Pakistan. Study results show that there is a positive and significant relationship between job security and coordination with employees’ performance. The results also reveal that coercive pressure moderates job security, coordination, and psychological safety with employees’ performance. Implications for organizations and HEIs administration are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, Y. M., Ahmad, W., Arshad, M., Yin, H. L., Ahmad, B., & Ali, Z. (2021). Impact of coordination, psychological safety, and job security on employees’ performance: the moderating role of coercive pressure. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063175

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free