Main-group test set for materials science and engineering with user-friendly graphical tools for error analysis: Systematic benchmark of the numerical and intrinsic errors in state-of-the-art electronic-structure approximations

22Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Understanding the applicability and limitations of electronic-structure methods needs careful and efficient comparison with accurate reference data. Knowledge of the quality and errors of electronic-structure calculations is crucial to advanced method development, high-throughput computations and data analyses. In this paper, we present a main-group test set for computational materials science and engineering (MSE), that provides accurate and easily accessible crystal properties for a hierarchy of exchange-correlation approximations, ranging from the well-established mean-field approximations to the state-of-the-art methods of many-body perturbation theory. We consider cohesive energy, lattice constant and bulk modulus of a set of materials that representatives for the first- and second-row elements and their binaries with cubic crystal structures and various bonding characters. A strong effort is made to achieve high numerical accuracy for cohesive properties as calculated using the local-density approximation (LDA), several generalized gradient approximations (GGAs), meta-GGAs and hybrids in all-electron resolution, and the second-order Moller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) and the random-phase approximation (RPA) both with frozen-core approximation based on all-electron Hartree-Fock, PBE and/or PBE0 references. This results in over 10 000 calculations, which record a comprehensive convergence test with respect to numerical parameters for a wide range of electronic-structure methods within the numerical atom-centered orbital framework. As an indispensable part of the MSE test set, a web site is established http://mse.fhi-berlin.mpg.de. This not only allows for easy access to all reference data but also provides user-friendly graphical tools for post-processing error analysis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, I. Y., Logsdail, A. J., Ren, X., Levchenko, S. V., Ghiringhelli, L., & Scheffler, M. (2019). Main-group test set for materials science and engineering with user-friendly graphical tools for error analysis: Systematic benchmark of the numerical and intrinsic errors in state-of-the-art electronic-structure approximations. New Journal of Physics, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aaf751

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free