Abstract
Background The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to examine periconceptional misreporting of energy intake (EI) using the Willet food frequency questionnaire (WFFQ). Methods Women were recruited in the first trimester.Women completed a semi-quantitative WFFQ. Maternal body composition was measured using eight-electrode bioelectrical impedance analysis. Under-reporters were those whose ratio of EI to their calculated basal metabolic rate fell below the calculated plausible threshold for their physical activity category. Results The mean age was 30.1±5.3 years (n = 524). The mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.4±5.6 kg/m2, and 16.6% were obese (BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2). Under-reported EI was observed in 122 women (23.3%) with no over-reporters in the sample. Under-reporters were younger (P, 0.001), less likely to have a normal BMI (P = 0.002) and more likely to be obese (P, 0.001) than plausible reporters. Under-reporters had higher percentage of body-fat and lower percentage of body fat-free mass (P, 0.001), were more likely to be at risk of relative deprivation (P = 0.001) and reported a higher percentage of EI from carbohydrate (P = 0.02) than plausible reporters. Conclusions Observed differences between under-reporters and plausible reporters suggest that the exclusion of these under-reporters represents an important potential source of bias in obesity research among women in the periconceptional period.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Mullaney, L., O’Higgins, A. C., Cawley, S., Doolan, A., McCartney, D., & Turner, M. J. (2015). An estimation of periconceptional under-reporting of dietary energy intake. Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom), 37(4), 728–736. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdu086
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.