SENTIMENT ANALYSIS OF THREE-PERIOD POLEMICS USING K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR WITH TF-IDF WEIGHTING

  • Ernawati S
  • Wati R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The issue of changing the presidential term which was originally 2 periods of government into 3 periods raises pros and cons in the community. Many 3-period hashtags have sprung up on social media twitter. So that conducted research on sentiment analysis of presidential election polemics 3 period. The purpose of the study was to produce the value of classification on the issue of presidential election change discourse into 3 periods using the K-NN method and whether the k-NN method proved to be well used for classifying text in the review of presidential election polemics 3 periods. Dataset totaling 1152 data, data is processed using Python and Jupyter Notebook as a text editor. The data is classified into positive reviews and negative reviews, then the data is divided into training data and test data with a ratio of 90:10. Weighting words using TF-IDF and sentiment classification using K-NN method. From the results of classification using the K-NN method obtained the highest accuracy when the value of k=17 and k = 18 with an accuracy of 85.3%. The results of the analysis of public sentiment to review the issue of discourse on the change of presidential term into 3 periods tend to be negative with a percentage of 21.26% positive sentiment and 78.74% negative sentiment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ernawati, S., & Wati, R. (2022). SENTIMENT ANALYSIS OF THREE-PERIOD POLEMICS USING K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR WITH TF-IDF WEIGHTING. Jurnal Riset Informatika, 4(3), 215–220. https://doi.org/10.34288/jri.v4i3.377

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free