Facilitating interpretive resilience: The Joseph story (genesis 37-50) as a site of struggle

3Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article argues that the notion of the Bible as a site of struggle offers resources that may facilitate interpretive resilience for communities/sectors that have been marginalised by dominant biblical theologies. While the notion of the Bible as a site of struggle had its conceptualisation within historical-critical redaction criticism, literary-narrative and literary-rhetorical criticisms provide similar kinds of “critical” recognition of ideo-theological contestation within the biblical text, whether the final form or a socio-historically reconstructed redactional edition. This article uses the Joseph story in Genesis as a case study. Central to the understanding of interpretive resilience in this article is the recognition that marginalised sectors themselves build their interpretive resilience as they navigate and negotiate the (additional) kinds of resources biblical studies might offer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

West, G. O. (2018). Facilitating interpretive resilience: The Joseph story (genesis 37-50) as a site of struggle. Acta Theologica, 2018, 17–37. https://doi.org/10.18820/23099089/actat.Sup26.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free