The new humanism: The criticism of educational progressivism

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The New Humanism is a movement of literary criticism deployed from the beginning of the twentieth cen¬tury to the Second World War, which has many implications for education. We discuss two of his principal figures, Irving Babbitt (1865) 1933), and Norman Foerster (1887-1972) to expose these issues. For the New Humanists, the teaching of “great books” has a moral and political significance and should not be reserved for specialists in literature or philosophy. This study must be widely proposed, especially at the level of secondary education, in a democratic school. For this reason, the Progressive education is the target of criticism, as an aspect of a civilization wich has reversed thte sense of Progress. Scientific progress has created a power that is not accompanied by wisdom, while the romantic reaction to the upheaval of culture through the exploration of nature has engendered sterile sentimenta¬lism. It is in this perspective that works must be analyzed and transmitted. Norman Foerster has written and applied a program for the University of Iowa that gives a concrete idea of the teaching of the New Humanists. Should we be inspired by them to give a “bildung” to the contemporary subjects, lacking landmarks in the disorder of the twenty-first century?.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ottavi, D. (2019). The new humanism: The criticism of educational progressivism. Revista Lusofona de Educacao, 43(43), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.24140/issn.1645-7250.rle43.09

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free