Abstract
Objective: We aimed to determine the safety and feasibility of general anaesthesia (GA) compared with local anaesthesia + Monitored Anaesthesia Care (LA+MAC) for One-Day Thyroid Surgery (ODTS); to assess patient and operator satisfaction with either of the anesthetic approaches. Material and Methods: We reviewed prospectively 130 patients who underwent ODTS from 2008 to 2011. 64 patients were operated on under GA and 62 - under LA+MAC. All variables of patient demographic characteristics, duration and type of operation, postoperative complications, difficulty in airway management and postoperative opiate consumption were recorded and analyzed. Results: There is no difference in respect to length of stay, discharge time and major/minor complications rate between two groups, but in the LA+MAC group, pain appears earlier and is more severe (56min; VAS 6, 5) than in GA patients (223 min; VAS 1, 5; p<0.001). Patient satisfaction was similar but the operator preference was greater for GA. Conclusion: In experienced hands LA with MAC for Thyroidectomy is a safe and wise choice, but GA is even more so!. © Trakya University Faculty of Medicine.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Belitova, M., Pandev, R., & Karadimov, D. (2012). General or local anaesthesia in one-day thyroid surgery-does it matter? Balkan Medical Journal. Galenos Publishing House. https://doi.org/10.5152/balkanmedj.2012.006
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.