Response to "comment on Nonlinear gyrokinetic theory with polarization drift'" [Phys. Plasmas 17, 124701 (2010)]

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We agree that there is no contradiction between Wang and Hahm [Phys. Plasmas 17, 082304 (2010)] and Sosenko [Phys. Scr. 64, 264 (2001)]. However, by explicitly evaluating the change in phase-volume due to the electrostatic potential [T. S. Hahm, Phys. Plasmas 3, 4658 (1996)], Wang and Hahm [Phys. Plasmas 17, 082304 (2010)] has demonstrated that the polarization density remains the same even when the polarization drift explicitly appears in the gyrocenter equations of motion, and has derived an energy invariant in general toroidal geometry. © 2010 American Institute of Physics.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, L., & Hahm, T. S. (2010, December). Response to “comment on Nonlinear gyrokinetic theory with polarization drift’’" [Phys. Plasmas 17, 124701 (2010)].” Physics of Plasmas. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3521606

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 4

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

17%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 6

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free