Comparative effectiveness of nonpharmacological therapies for postoperative cognitive dysfunction: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a common complication following surgery. Electroacupuncture (EA), manual acupuncture (MA), transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS), and cognitive training (CT) can effectively maintain or improve the postoperative cognitive function of patients. However, it remains unclear which therapy is the most effective. Therefore, this network meta-analysis aims to compare and rank the efficacy of these non-pharmacological therapies for POCD to identify the optimal therapy. Methods and analysis A systematic search will be conducted across seven databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, AMED, and PsycINFO) for articles published between January 2000 and November 2023. Two reviewers will independently conduct study selection and data extraction. The primary outcome will be the changes in the overall cognitive function before and after the intervention. The secondary outcome will be the incidence of POCD. The risk of bias will be assessed using the revised Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analyses will be performed using RevMan, STATA, and Aggregate Data Drug Information System statistical software. Additionally, the quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation guidelines. Ethics and dissemination: The results will be disseminated to peer-reviewed journals or conferences.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wu, K., Bao, Q., Huang, J., Sun, S., Li, Y., Zhang, X., … Liang, F. (2024). Comparative effectiveness of nonpharmacological therapies for postoperative cognitive dysfunction: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 19(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309605

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free