Paracetamol use in early life and asthma: Prospective birth cohort study

95Citations
Citations of this article
113Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To determine if use of paracetamol in early life is an independent risk factor for childhood asthma. Design: Prospective birth cohort study. Setting: Melbourne Atopy Cohort Study. Participants: 620 children with a family history of allergic disease, with paracetamol use prospectively documented on 18 occasions from birth to 2 years of age, followed until age 7 years. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was childhood asthma, ascertained by questionnaire at 6 and 7 years. Secondary outcomes were infantile wheeze, allergic rhinitis, eczema, and skin prick test positivity. Results: Paracetamol had been used in 51% (295/575) of children by 12 weeks of age and in 97% (556/575) by 2 years. Between 6 and 7 years, 80% (495/620) were followed up; 30% (148) had current asthma. Increasing frequency of paracetamol use was weakly associated with increased risk of childhood asthma (crude odds ratio 1.18, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.39, per doubling of days of use). However, after adjustment for frequency of respiratory infections, this association essentially disappeared (odds ratio 1.08, 0.91 to 1.29). Paracetamol use for non-respiratory causes was not associated with asthma (crude odds ratio 0.95, 0.81 to 1.12). Conclusions: In children with a family history of allergic diseases, no association was found between early paracetamol use and risk of subsequent allergic disease after adjustment for respiratory infections or when paracetamol use was restricted to non-respiratory tract infections. These findings suggest that early paracetamol use does not increase the risk of asthma.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lowe, A. J., Carlin, J. B., Bennett, C. M., Hosking, C. S., Allen, K. J., Robertson, C. F., … Dharmage, S. C. (2010). Paracetamol use in early life and asthma: Prospective birth cohort study. BMJ (Online), 341(7775), 713. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c4616

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free