Abstract
Tissue salvage of severely ischemic myocardium requires timely reperfusion by thrombolysis, angioplasty, or bypass. However, recovery of left ventricular function is rare. It may be absent or, even worse, reperfusion can induce further damage. Laboratory studies have shown convincingly that reperfusion can increase injury over and above that attributable to the pre-existing ischemia, precipitating arrhythmias, suppressing the recovery of contractile function (“stunning”) and possibly even causing cell death in potentially salvable ischemic tissue. The mechanisms of reperfusion injury have been widely studied and, in the laboratory, it can be attenuated or prevented. Disappointingly, this is not the case in the clinic, particularly after thrombolysis or primary angioplasty. In contrast, excellent results have been achieved by surgeons by means of cardioplegia and hypothermia. For the interventionist, the issue is more complex as, contrary to cardiac surgery where the cardioplegia can be applied before ischemia and the heart can be stopped, during an angioplasty the heart still has to beat to support the circulation. We analyze in detail all these issues.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ferrari, R., Balla, C., Malagù, M., Guardigli, G., Morciano, G., Bertini, M., … Campo, G. (2017). Reperfusion damage — a story of success, failure, and hope —. Circulation Journal. Japanese Circulation Society. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1124
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.