Non-extraction treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion

1Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Every orthodontist at some point in his clinical practice has faced the dilemma of how ′best′ to manage a mild to moderate Class II malocclusion. Aims and Objectives: To demonstrate the efficacy of Forsus™ Fatigue Resistant Device in the management of Class II malocclusion. Materials and Method: A patient having Class II division 1 malocclusion with functional jaw retrusion was treated using MBT 0.022" prescription and Forsus FRD appliance. Pre- and post-treatment photographs and lateral cephalograms were taken. Cephalometric analysis was done, and results were superimposed. Result: 7-8 months of Forsus wear obtained stable and successful results with improvement in facial profile, skeletal jaw relationship, and mild increase in IMPA. Discussion and Conclusion: Greater forward displacement of the mandible was the predominant factor for successful treatment Class II patient. Forsus gives good results for class II management, and it would be wise to consider treating such cases by non-extraction approach rather than contemplating extractions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jain, A. K., Patil, A. K., Ganeshkar, S. V., Sangamesh, B., & Chugh, T. (2012). Non-extraction treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, 3(3), 334–337. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.103631

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free