Incorporating Health Policy and Advocacy Curricula Into Undergraduate Medical Education in the United States

  • Krishnamurthy S
  • Soltany K
  • Montez K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Physicians serve as crucial advocates for their patients. Undergraduate medical education (UME) must move beyond the biomedical model, built upon the perception that health is defined purely in the absence of illness, to also incorporate population health through health policy, advocacy, and community engagement to account for structural and social determinants of health. Currently, the US guidelines for UME lack structured training in health policy or advocacy, leaving trainees ill-equipped to assume their role as physician–advocates or to engage with communities. There is an undeniable need to educate future physicians on legislative advocacy toward improving the social determinants of health through the creation of evidence-based health policy, in addition to training in effective techniques to engage in partnership with the communities in which physicians serve. The authors of this article also present curricular case studies around two programs at their institution that could be used to implement similar programs at other US medical schools.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krishnamurthy, S., Soltany, K. A., & Montez, K. (2023). Incorporating Health Policy and Advocacy Curricula Into Undergraduate Medical Education in the United States. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205231191601

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free