What makes a good game? Using reviews to inform design

31Citations
Citations of this article
103Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The characteristics that identify a good game are hard to define and reproduce, as demonstrated by the catalogues of both successes and failures from most games companies. We have started to address this by undertaking a grounded theoretical analysis of reviews garnered from games, both good and bad, to distil from these common features that characterize good and bad games. We have identified that a good game is cohesive, varied, has good user interaction and offers some form of social interaction. The most important factor to avoid is a bad pricing. Successfully achieving some of these good factors will also outweigh problems in other areas. © 2009 The Author.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bond, M., & Beale, R. (2009). What makes a good game? Using reviews to inform design. In People and Computers XXIII Celebrating People and Technology - Proceedings of HCI 2009 (pp. 418–422). British Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/hci2009.52

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free