A projected-search interior-point method for nonlinearly constrained optimization

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper concerns the formulation and analysis of a new interior-point method for constrained optimization that combines a shifted primal-dual interior-point method with a projected-search method for bound-constrained optimization. The method involves the computation of an approximate Newton direction for a primal-dual penalty-barrier function that incorporates shifts on both the primal and dual variables. Shifts on the dual variables allow the method to be safely “warm started” from a good approximate solution and avoids the possibility of very large solutions of the associated path-following equations. The approximate Newton direction is used in conjunction with a new projected-search line-search algorithm that employs a flexible non-monotone quasi-Armijo line search for the minimization of each penalty-barrier function. Numerical results are presented for a large set of constrained optimization problems. For comparison purposes, results are also given for two primal-dual interior-point methods that do not use projection. The first is a method that shifts both the primal and dual variables. The second is a method that involves shifts on the primal variables only. The results show that the use of both primal and dual shifts in conjunction with projection gives a method that is more robust and requires significantly fewer iterations. In particular, the number of times that the search direction must be computed is substantially reduced. Results from a set of quadratic programming test problems indicate that the method is particularly well-suited to solving the quadratic programming subproblem in a sequential quadratic programming method for nonlinear optimization.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gill, P. E., & Zhang, M. (2024). A projected-search interior-point method for nonlinearly constrained optimization. Computational Optimization and Applications, 88(1), 37–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-023-00549-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free