Anything Goes? Analyzing Varied Understandings of Assent

9Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Assent to medical research or treatment may be an intuitively attractive way to address the area between incapacity and capacity that might otherwise be subject to a best interests assessment. Assent has become a widely disseminated concept in law, research, and clinical ethics, but little conceptual work on assent has so far occurred. An exploration of use of assent in treatment and research in children and people with dementia suggests that at least five claims are made on behalf of assent. Since at least some of these may lead to tensions with others, assent requires firmer conceptual underpinning. Whether assent remains primarily a local approach to research in children in the United States, where it appears to fit with legal background conditions, or develops its promise to overturn the dominant, binary, approach to (in)capacity will depend on the strength of future philosophical work to improve the theoretical foundations to assent.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Birchley, G. (2023). Anything Goes? Analyzing Varied Understandings of Assent. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 32(1), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180122000524

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free