Brief report: Fraudulent data responses as a major threat to validity in online autism research – Case studies from four independent research teams

2Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: The growing popularity of online research increases risks of fraudulent data that threaten the validity of findings. Autism research is particularly susceptible, as digital methods are frequently used to enhance inclusivity and accessibility. Methods: Here we examine this vulnerability to bot-generated data and impersonation by scammers, which can jeopardize the integrity of study results. Results: Four case studies are presented from independent research teams who encountered fraudulent participation. Each team used a variety of strategies to detect, address, and prevent these issues. Conclusion: Our discussion emphasizes the importance of balancing the need for ethical inclusivity, particularly for autistic people who may benefit from online participation options, with necessary data integrity protections.We emphasize the role of proactive and adaptable safeguards in mitigating threats posed by fraudulent responses without inadvertently limiting access for legitimate participants. Finally, we offer practical recommendations for autism researchers to mitigate validity threats.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bottini, S. B., Dwyer, P., Kaplan-Kahn, E. A., Proctor, K., Gurba, A., & Morton, H. E. (2025). Brief report: Fraudulent data responses as a major threat to validity in online autism research – Case studies from four independent research teams. Research in Autism, 125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reia.2025.202619

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free