Second breast cancer following negative breast MRI: Analysis by interval from surgery and risk factors

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives This study aims to compare outcomes following a negative surveillance MRI study by surgery-MRI interval and investigate factors associated with second breast cancers in women with a personal history of breast cancer (PHBC). Methods This retrospective study included 1552 consecutive women (mean age, 53 years) with a PHBC and a negative prevalence surveillance breast MRI result between August 2014 and December 2016. The incidence and characteristics of second breast cancers were reviewed and compared according to surgery-MRI interval (< 3 years vs ≥ 3 years). Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate associations with clinical-pathologic characteristics. Results Twenty-five second breast cancers occurred after negative MRI. The incidence of second breast cancers or local-regional recurrence did not significantly differ by surgery-MRI interval. The median intervals between MRI to second breast cancer detection showed no significant difference between the two groups (surgery-MRI interval <3 years vs. ≥ 3 years). Two node-positive second breast cancers were detected in the group with <3 years interval. BRCA mutation status, receipt of breast-conserving surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (all p < .05) were significant factors associated with the development of second breast cancers. Conclusion Outcomes following a negative surveillance MRI did not differ by surgery-MRI interval. BRCA mutation status, receipt of breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy were independently associated with the risk of developing second breast cancers after negative surveillance MRI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Joo, Y., Kim, M. J., Yoon, J. H., Rho, M., & Park, V. Y. (2024). Second breast cancer following negative breast MRI: Analysis by interval from surgery and risk factors. PLoS ONE, 19(8 August). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306828

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free