Abstract
Background: Currently, the decision to perform a concurrent posterior repair/perineoplasty at the time of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy is not standardized. Objective: We sought to compare anatomic failure after robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy among 3 groups of patients categorized by their preoperative and postoperative genital hiatus size. Study Design: We performed a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy, from January 2013 through September 2016. We defined a wide genital hiatus as ≥4 cm and a normal genital hiatus as <4 cm. We compared 3 groups: (1) wide preoperative and postoperative genital hiatus (persistently wide); (2) wide preoperative and normal postoperative genital hiatus (improved); and (3) normal preoperative and postoperative genital hiatus (stably normal). Our primary outcome was composite anatomic failure defined as either recurrent prolapse in any compartment past the hymen or retreatment for prolapse with either surgery or pessary. Our data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance and χ2 test. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate for independent risk factors for anatomic failure among the 3 groups. P
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Bradley, M. S., Askew, A. L., Vaughan, M. H., Kawasaki, A., & Visco, A. G. (2018). Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: early postoperative outcomes after surgical reduction of enlarged genital hiatus. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 218(5), 514.e1-514.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.046
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.