Cancer clinical trial vs real-world outcomes for standard of care first-line treatment in the advanced disease setting

8Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Clinical trials have strict eligibility criteria, potentially limiting external validity. However, while often discussed this has seldom been explored, particularly across cancer types and at variable time frames posttrial completion. We examined comprehensive registry data (January 2014 to June 2019) for standard first-line treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), advanced pancreatic cancer (PC), metastatic HER2-amplified breast cancer (BC) and castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CaP). Registry patient characteristics and outcomes were compared to the practice-changing trial. Registry patients were older than the matched trial cohort by a median of 2-6 years (all P =

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kostos, L., Hong, W., Lee, B., Tran, B., Lok, S. W., Anton, A., … Gibbs, P. (2021). Cancer clinical trial vs real-world outcomes for standard of care first-line treatment in the advanced disease setting. International Journal of Cancer, 149(2), 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33568

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free