Explaining differences in learning outcomes in auditing education - The importance of background factors, prior knowledge and intellectual skills

5Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper we use a learner perspective on learning outcomes which reflects that some students taking accounting classes are also provided with on-the-job training in accounting firms. Hence knowledge about learning outcomes for different groups of students is essential information for educators as well as the accounting profession. This paper extends prior research on the role of declarative and procedural knowledge in performing auditing tasks. Measuring learning outcomes is a complex matter requiring sensible measures for both declarative knowledge (ability to verbalize pertinent facts or processes) and procedural knowledge (intellectual skills). The performance of 75 graduate accounting students representing both types of schema is examined. The findings suggest that differences in learning outcomes may be attributed to differences in student background and prior knowledge (auditing experience). The findings also suggest that the importance of prior knowledge is mitigated by the intellectual skills required for a particular task.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Holm, C., & Steenholdt, N. (2014). Explaining differences in learning outcomes in auditing education - The importance of background factors, prior knowledge and intellectual skills. Review of European Studies, 6(2), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v6n2p63

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free