Noncooperative management of the northeast atlantic cod fishery: A first mover advantage

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The point of departure for this analysis is Bjørndal and Lindroos [2012], who developed an empirical bioeconomic model to analyze cooperative and noncooperative management of Northeast Atlantic cod. In their analysis, only constant strategies were analyzed for noncooperative games. In this paper, nonconstant strategies are considered. Moreover, the fishery in question is characterized by cooperative management. What may happen in the real world is that one nation breaks the cooperative agreement by fishing in excess of its quota. Often, it takes time for the other agent to detect this and respond. In this paper, we allow this kind of delayed response into a two-agent noncooperative game so that, if country 2 exceeds its quota, there will be a time lag before this is detected by country 1; moreover, there may also be a delay until country 1 is able to respond. Results show that the outcome critically depends on the length of these two lags as well as initial conditions. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bjørndal, T., & Lindroos, M. (2014). Noncooperative management of the northeast atlantic cod fishery: A first mover advantage. Natural Resource Modeling, 27(3), 396–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/nrm.12040

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free