After Mr. Nowhere: What Kind of Proper Self for a Scientist?

  • Harding S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The conventional proper scientific self has an ethical obligation to strive to see everywhere in the universe from no particular location in that universe: he is to produce the view from nowhere. What different conceptions of the proper scientific self are created by the distinctive assumptions and research practices of social justice movements, such as feminism, anti-racism, and post-colonialism? Three such new ideals are: the multiple and conflicted knowing self; the researcher strategically located inside her research world; and the community that knows.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harding, S. (2015). After Mr. Nowhere: What Kind of Proper Self for a Scientist? Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5206/fpq/2015.1.2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free