Pharmacogenomics of anti-platelet therapy: How much evidence is enough for clinical implementation?

28Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Pharmacogenomics, the study of the genomics of drug response and adverse effects, holds great promise for more effective individualized (personalized) medicine. Recent evidence supports a role of loss-of-function (LOF) variants in the cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP2C19 as a determinant of clopidogrel response. Patients given clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention who carry LOF variants do not metabolize clopidogrel, a prodrug, into its active form resulting in decreased inhibition of platelet function and a higher likelihood of recurrent cardiovascular events. Despite a large body of evidence supporting clinical utility, adoption of anti-platelet pharmacogenetics into clinical practice has been slow. In this review, we summarize the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and clinical evidence, identify gaps in knowledge and other barriers that appear to be slowing adoption, and describe CYP2C19 pharmacogenetics implementation projects currently underway. Only when we surmount these barriers will clinicians be able to use pharmacogenetic information in conjunction with the history, physical examination and other medical tests and information to choose the most efficacious anti-platelet therapy for each individual patient. © 2013 The Japan Society of Human Genetics All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Perry, C. G., & Shuldiner, A. R. (2013, June). Pharmacogenomics of anti-platelet therapy: How much evidence is enough for clinical implementation? Journal of Human Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/jhg.2013.41

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free