Role of microbiologic culture results of specimens prior to onset of ventilator-associated pneumonia in the patients admitted to intensive care unit

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in intensive care unit (ICU) have a high mortality rate. The routine surveillance cultures obtained previously or an ATS guideline for hospital-acquired pneumonia was used in selecting initial antimicrobials. The object of this study was to compare the respiratory samples before VAP and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) culture. Methods: 54 patients underwent fiberoptic bronchoscopy to obtain BAL samples. We reviewed microbiologic specimen results of prior respiratory specimens (pre-VAP) and BAL. Results: Among 51 patients with 54 VAP episodes, 52 microorganisms of pre-VAP and 56 BAL samples were isolated. Pre-VAP included 21.2% of MRSA, and 32.6% of multidrug resistant-Acinetobacter baumannii (MDR-AB). BAL samples comprised 25.0% of MRSA, 26.7% of MDR-AB, 14.3% of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and 3.6% of Klebsiella pneumonia in order. In pre-VAP samples compared to BAL samples, only 35.2% were identical. In BAL samples compared to pre-VAP samples obtained in 5 days before the onset of VAP, only 43.6% were identical. However, among BAL samples compared to pre-VAP samples obtained after more than 5 days, 13.3% were identical (p=0.037). Conclusion: Based on these data, pre-VAP samples obtained prior to 5 day onset of VAP may help to predict the causative microorganisms and to select appropriate initial antimicrobials. Copyright©2012. The Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, J. H., Yoon, S. C., Lee, Y. M., Son, J. W., Choi, E. G., Na, M. J., & Kwon, S. J. (2012). Role of microbiologic culture results of specimens prior to onset of ventilator-associated pneumonia in the patients admitted to intensive care unit. Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, 72(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2012.72.1.30

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free