Vibrational entropy differences between mesophile and thermophile proteins and their use in protein engineering

22Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We recently introduced ENCoM, an elastic network atomic contact model, as the first coarse-grained normal mode analysis method that accounts for the nature of amino acids and can predict the effect of mutations on thermostability based on changes vibrational entropy. In this proof-of-concept article, we use pairs of mesophile and thermophile homolog proteins with identical structures to determine if a measure of vibrational entropy based on normal mode analysis can discriminate thermophile from mesophile proteins. We observe that in around 60% of cases, thermophile proteins are more rigid at equivalent temperatures than their mesophile counterpart and this difference can guide the design of proteins to increase their thermostability through series of mutations. We observe that mutations separating thermophile proteins from their mesophile orthologs contribute independently to a decrease in vibrational entropy and discuss the application and implications of this methodology to protein engineering.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Frappier, V., & Najmanovich, R. (2015). Vibrational entropy differences between mesophile and thermophile proteins and their use in protein engineering. Protein Science, 24(4), 474–483. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.2592

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free