Validation of a fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for cattle serum and plasma progesterone measurement

6Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Monitoring circulating progesterone concentration ([P4]) is an important component of basic and applied reproduction research and clinical settings. IMMULITE® 2000 XPi (Siemens Healthineers, Cary, NC) is a newly upgraded fully automated immunoassay system marketed for human use to measure concentrations of different measurands including P4. Objectives: Our objective was therefore to characterize the analytical performance of the IMMULITE® 2000 XPi P4 immunoassay (IPI) across the reportable range in serum and plasma of cattle. Methods: The IPI validation protocols included characterization of the method linearity, within-run, and between-run precision through calculation of the coefficient of variation (CV). The method accuracy was assessed through the calculation of the spiking-recovery (SR) bias across the reportable range (0.2–40.0 ng/mL). Passing–Bablok regression and Bland-Altman plots were used to determine the interlaboratory bias for two laboratories. Three types of observed total error (TEo) were calculated based on the considered type of bias, TEoSR (spiking-recovery), TEoRB (range-based bias), and TEoAB (average-based bias). Results: The IPI was linearly related to the true value (R2 = 0.997) across the reportable range. The within-run and between-run precision (CV%) of the IPI for both serum and plasma [P4] of clinical relevance (1, 2, 5, and 10 ng/mL) were <5 and <10%, respectively. The TEo reported here for serum and plasma at [P4] of 1 and 5 ng/mL was ~20 and 25%, respectively. Of interest, the three types of TEo were relatively similar regardless of the considered bias. Conclusions: We concluded that the automated IPI provides a precise, accurate, reliable, and safe method for measuring [P4] in both serum and plasma of cattle. Consistent with the manufacturer's recommendations, the serum matrix is more accurate than plasma.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Megahed, A. A., Jones, K. L., Bisinotto, R. S., Chebel, R. C., Galvão, K. N., Chan, A. M., & Bittar, J. H. J. (2023). Validation of a fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for cattle serum and plasma progesterone measurement. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1064201

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free