Assessing Associations Between Changes in Risk and Subsequent Reoffending

  • Yang M
  • Guo B
  • Olver M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Research on recidivism prediction has made important advances, but the same cannot be said of research assessing relationships between risk changes over time or after treatment and subsequent reoffending. In realistic criminal justice situations, data linking changes in risk to recidivism are often fraught with problems due to missing data, irregular intervals in repeat risk assessments, and individual differences such as age and risk levels. Traditional statistical methodologies such as ANCOVA for repeated measures are not suited for analyzing data with these features. We presented four types of statistical modeling techniques that can effectively accommodate these noisier data: conventional regression, conditional regression, two-stage, and joint models. The two-stage models consist of multilevel growth model and conventional regression. The joint models refer to structural equational models. Two example data sets were used to illustrate the application of these methodologies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, M., Guo, B., Olver, M. E., Polaschek, D. L. L., & Wong, S. C. P. (2017). Assessing Associations Between Changes in Risk and Subsequent Reoffending. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(1), 59–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816678648

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free