Explanatory Depth in Primordial Cosmology: A Comparative Study of Inflationary and Bouncing Paradigms

5Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We develop and apply a multi-dimensional account of explanatory depth towards a comparative analysis of inflationary and bouncing paradigms in primordial cosmology. Our analysis builds on earlier work due to Azhar and Loeb that establishes initial conditions fine-tuning as a dimension of explanatory depth relevant to debates in contemporary cosmology. We propose dynamical fine-tuning and autonomy as two further dimensions of depth in the context of problems with instability and trans-Planckian modes that afflict bouncing and inflationary approaches, respectively. In the context of the latter issue, we argue that the recently formulated trans-Planckian censorship conjecture leads to a trade-off for inflationary models between dynamical fine-tuning and autonomy. We conclude with the suggestion that explanatory preference with regard to the different dimensions of depth is best understood in terms of differing attitudes towards heuristics for future model building.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wolf, W. J., & Thébault, K. P. Y. (2026). Explanatory Depth in Primordial Cosmology: A Comparative Study of Inflationary and Bouncing Paradigms. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 77(2), 441–476. https://doi.org/10.1086/725096

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free