The link between bond forfeiture and pretrial release mechanism: The case of Dallas County, Texas

9Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of four pretrial jail release mechanisms (i.e., bond types) commonly used during the pretrial phase of the criminal justice process in terms of their ability to discriminate between defendants failing to appear in court (i.e., bond forfeiture). These include attorney bonds, cash bonds, commercial bail bonds, and release via a pretrial services agency. Methods A multi-treatment propensity score matching protocol was employed to assess between-release-mechanism differences in the conditional probability of failure to appear/bond forfeiture. Data were culled from archival state justice records comprising all defendants booked into the Dallas County, Texas jail during 2008 (n = 29,416). Results The results suggest that defendants released via commercial bail bonds were less likely to experience failure to appear leading to the bond forfeiture process compared to equivalent defendants released via cash, attorney, and pretrial services bonds. This finding held across different offense categories. The study frames these differences within a discussion encompassing procedural variation within and between each release mechanism, thereby setting the stage for further research and dialog regarding potential justice reform.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clipper, S. J., Morris, R. G., & Russell-Kaplan, A. (2017). The link between bond forfeiture and pretrial release mechanism: The case of Dallas County, Texas. PLoS ONE, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182772

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free