Comorbid conditions and outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention

44Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether adding comorbid conditions to a risk model can help predict in-hospital outcome and long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Design: Retrospective chart review Setting: Academic medical centre. Patients: 7659 patients who had 9032 PCIs. Interventions: PCI performed at Mayo Clinic between 1 January 1999 and 30 June 2004. Main outcome measures: The Mayo Clinic Risk Score (MCRS) and the coronary artery disease (CAD)-specific index for determination of comorbid conditions in all patients. Results: The mean (SD) MCRS score was 6.5 (2.9). The CAD-specific index was 0 or 1 in 46%, 2 or 3 in 30% and 4 or higher in 24%. The rate of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) increased with higher MCRS and CAD-specific index (Cochran-Armitage test, p<0.001 for both models). The c-statistic for the MCRS for in-hospital MACE was 0.78; adding the CAD-specific index did not improve its discriminatory ability for inhospital MACE (c-statistic = 0.78; likelihood ratio test, p = 0.29). A total of 707 deaths after dismissal occurred after 7253 successful procedures. The c-statistic for all-cause mortality was 0.69 for the MCRS model alone and 0.75 for the MCRS and CAD-specific indices together (likelihood ratio test, p<0.001), indicating significant improvement in the discriminatory ability. Conclusions: Addition of comorbid conditions to the MCRS adds significant prognostic information for postdismissal mortality but adds little prognostic information about in-hospital complications after PCI. Such health-status measures should be included in future risk stratification models that predict long-term mortality after PCI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Singh, M., Rihal, C. S., Roger, V. L., Lennon, R. J., Spertus, J., Jahangir, A., & Holmes, D. R. (2008). Comorbid conditions and outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart, 94(11), 1424–1428. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2007.126649

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free