Abstract
Starting from the idea that counter-hegemonic territorialities inrural areas are the result of a dual process of learning and/or adaptation: one internalto the own territory resulting from the coevolution between ecosystems andcommunity, and the other external between territories -which involves the processesof territorialization of capital over traditional territories. These adaptive dynamicsof traditional and alternative territories are expressed in hybridisms of practicesand social representations, modern and traditional, about reproductive attributesof nature: nature’s fertility in the traditional territories subsumes the complex socio-environmental reproducibility, while the imaginary of nature in modern scientificculture subsumes objectified productivity of ecosystems. In other words, it is aboutinterpreting narratives and politics of nature. Indeed, understanding the complexityof socioterritorial reproduction of agriculture and traditional fishing, and alternatives(such as those of family farming with ecological bases), subsumes, therefore, theinseparability between the objective and subjective aspects of reprodutibility ofthe productive system lato sensu, this is, of local geo-ecological conditions,traditional values and symbols, which are synthesized in adaptation strategies andresilience of rural communities against the project of (re)territorialization of capital over those counter-hegemonic territories.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Floriani, N., Ther Ríos, F., & Floriani, D. (2013). Territorialidades alternativas e hibridismos no mundo rural: resiliência e reproduçao da sociobiodiversidade em comunidades tradicionais do Brasil e Chile meridionais. Polis (Santiago), 12(34), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-65682013000100005
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.